lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11320C5D-9BB2-48D5-90A0-353F6D8EA78A@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 15:19:24 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
CC: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Linux
 NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi
	<lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] NFSD: convert write_threads, write_maxblksize and
 write_maxconn to netlink commands



> On Oct 2, 2023, at 9:25 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 09:44 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:05:10AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
>>>> index b71744e355a8..07e7a09e28e3 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
>>>> @@ -1694,6 +1694,147 @@ int nfsd_nl_rpc_status_get_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * nfsd_nl_threads_set_doit - set the number of running threads
>>>> + * @skb: reply buffer
>>>> + * @info: netlink metadata and command arguments
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return 0 on success or a negative errno.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int nfsd_nl_threads_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 nthreads;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!info->attrs[NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_THREADS])
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + nthreads = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_THREADS]);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = nfsd_svc(nthreads, genl_info_net(info), get_current_cred());
>>>> + return ret == nthreads ? 0 : ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int nfsd_nl_get_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
>>>> +    int cmd, int attr, u32 val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + void *hdr;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (cb->args[0]) /* already consumed */
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid, cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
>>>> +  &nfsd_nl_family, NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
>>>> + if (!hdr)
>>>> + return -ENOBUFS;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, attr, val))
>>>> + return -ENOBUFS;
>>>> +
>>>> + genlmsg_end(skb, hdr);
>>>> + cb->args[0] = 1;
>>>> +
>>>> + return skb->len;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * nfsd_nl_threads_get_dumpit - dump the number of running threads
>>>> + * @skb: reply buffer
>>>> + * @cb: netlink metadata and command arguments
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Returns the size of the reply or a negative errno.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int nfsd_nl_threads_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return nfsd_nl_get_dump(skb, cb, NFSD_CMD_THREADS_GET,
>>>> + NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_THREADS,
>>>> + nfsd_nrthreads(sock_net(skb->sk)));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * nfsd_nl_max_blksize_set_doit - set the nfs block size
>>>> + * @skb: reply buffer
>>>> + * @info: netlink metadata and command arguments
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return 0 on success or a negative errno.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int nfsd_nl_max_blksize_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(genl_info_net(info), nfsd_net_id);
>>>> + struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_MAX_BLKSIZE];
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!attr)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&nfsd_mutex);
>>>> + if (nn->nfsd_serv) {
>>>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>> 
>>> This code is wrong... but then the original in write_maxblksize is wrong
>>> to, so you can't be blamed.
>>> nfsd_max_blksize applies to nfsd in ALL network namespaces.  So if we
>>> need to check there are no active services in one namespace, we need to
>>> check the same for *all* namespaces.
>> 
>> Yes, the original code does look strange and is probably incorrect
>> with regard to its handling of the mutex. Shall we explore and fix
>> that issue in the nfsctl code first so that it can be backported to
>> stable kernels?
>> 
>> 
>>> I think we should make nfsd_max_blksize a per-namespace value.
>> 
>> That is a different conversation.
>> 
>> First, the current name of this tunable is incongruent with its
>> actual function, which is to specify the maximum network buffer size
>> that is allocated when the NFSD service pool is created. We should
>> find a more descriptive and specific name for this element in the
>> netlink protocol.
>> 
>> Second, it does seem like a candidate for becoming namespace-
>> specific, but TBH I'm not familiar enough with its current user
>> space consumers to know if that change would be welcome or fraught.
>> 
>> Since more discussion, research, and possibly a fix are needed, we
>> might drop max_blksize from this round and look for one or two
>> other tunables to convert for the first round.
>> 
>> 
> 
> I think we need to step back a bit further even, and consider what we
> want this to look like for users. How do we expect users to interact
> with these new interfaces in the future?
> 
> Most of these settings are things that are "set and forget" and things
> that we'd want to set up before we ever start any nfsd threads. I think
> as an initial goal here, we ought to aim to replace the guts of
> rpc.nfsd(8). Make it (preferentially) use the netlink interfaces for
> setting everything instead of writing to files under /proc/fs/nfsd.
> 
> That gives us a clear set of interfaces that need to be replaced as a
> first step, and gives us a start on integrating this change into nfs-
> utils.

Starting with rpc.nfsd as the initial consumer is a fine idea.
Those are in nfs-utils/utils/nfsd/nfssvc.c.

Looks like threads, ports, and versions are the target APIs?


>>>> +
>>>> + nfsd_max_blksize = nla_get_u32(attr);
>>>> + nfsd_max_blksize = max_t(int, nfsd_max_blksize, 1024);
>>>> + nfsd_max_blksize = min_t(int, nfsd_max_blksize, NFSSVC_MAXBLKSIZE);
>>>> + nfsd_max_blksize &= ~1023;
>>>> +out:
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&nfsd_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * nfsd_nl_max_blksize_get_dumpit - dump the nfs block size
>>>> + * @skb: reply buffer
>>>> + * @cb: netlink metadata and command arguments
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Returns the size of the reply or a negative errno.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int nfsd_nl_max_blksize_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> +   struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return nfsd_nl_get_dump(skb, cb, NFSD_CMD_MAX_BLKSIZE_GET,
>>>> + NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_MAX_BLKSIZE,
>>>> + nfsd_max_blksize);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * nfsd_nl_max_conn_set_doit - set the max number of connections
>>>> + * @skb: reply buffer
>>>> + * @info: netlink metadata and command arguments
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return 0 on success or a negative errno.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int nfsd_nl_max_conn_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(genl_info_net(info), nfsd_net_id);
>>>> + struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_MAX_CONN];
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!attr)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + nn->max_connections = nla_get_u32(attr);
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * nfsd_nl_max_conn_get_dumpit - dump the max number of connections
>>>> + * @skb: reply buffer
>>>> + * @cb: netlink metadata and command arguments
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Returns the size of the reply or a negative errno.
>>>> + */
>>>> +int nfsd_nl_max_conn_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> + struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(sock_net(cb->skb->sk), nfsd_net_id);
>>>> +
>>>> + return nfsd_nl_get_dump(skb, cb, NFSD_CMD_MAX_CONN_GET,
>>>> + NFSD_A_CONTROL_PLANE_MAX_CONN,
>>>> + nn->max_connections);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /**
>>>>  * nfsd_net_init - Prepare the nfsd_net portion of a new net namespace
>>>>  * @net: a freshly-created network namespace
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>

--
Chuck Lever



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ