netdev - [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: sfp: re-implement ignoring the hardware TX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1qnfXc-008UDY-91@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 14:34:24 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: sfp: re-implement ignoring the hardware
 TX_FAULT signal

Re-implement how we ignore the hardware TX_FAULT signal. Rather than
having a separate boolean for this, use a bitmask of the hardware
signals that we wish to ignore. This gives more flexibility in the
future to ignore other signals such as RX_LOS.

Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index a50038a45250..1f32e936d3ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ struct sfp {
 	unsigned int state_hw_drive;
 	unsigned int state_hw_mask;
 	unsigned int state_soft_mask;
+	unsigned int state_ignore_mask;
 	unsigned int state;
 
 	struct delayed_work poll;
@@ -280,7 +281,6 @@ struct sfp {
 	unsigned int rs_state_mask;
 
 	bool have_a2;
-	bool tx_fault_ignore;
 
 	const struct sfp_quirk *quirk;
 
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void sfp_fixup_long_startup(struct sfp *sfp)
 
 static void sfp_fixup_ignore_tx_fault(struct sfp *sfp)
 {
-	sfp->tx_fault_ignore = true;
+	sfp->state_ignore_mask |= SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
 }
 
 // For 10GBASE-T short-reach modules
@@ -789,7 +789,8 @@ static void sfp_soft_start_poll(struct sfp *sfp)
 
 	mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 	// Poll the soft state for hardware pins we want to ignore
-	sfp->state_soft_mask = ~sfp->state_hw_mask & mask;
+	sfp->state_soft_mask = ~sfp->state_hw_mask & ~sfp->state_ignore_mask &
+			       mask;
 
 	if (sfp->state_soft_mask & (SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT) &&
 	    !sfp->need_poll)
@@ -2314,7 +2315,7 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp, bool report)
 	sfp->module_t_start_up = T_START_UP;
 	sfp->module_t_wait = T_WAIT;
 
-	sfp->tx_fault_ignore = false;
+	sfp->state_ignore_mask = 0;
 
 	if (sfp->id.base.extended_cc == SFF8024_ECC_10GBASE_T_SFI ||
 	    sfp->id.base.extended_cc == SFF8024_ECC_10GBASE_T_SR ||
@@ -2337,6 +2338,8 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp, bool report)
 
 	if (sfp->quirk && sfp->quirk->fixup)
 		sfp->quirk->fixup(sfp);
+
+	sfp->state_hw_mask &= ~sfp->state_ignore_mask;
 	mutex_unlock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2838,10 +2841,7 @@ static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
 	mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 	state = sfp_get_state(sfp);
 	changed = state ^ sfp->state;
-	if (sfp->tx_fault_ignore)
-		changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS;
-	else
-		changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
+	changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < GPIO_MAX; i++)
 		if (changed & BIT(i))
-- 
2.30.2