[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ce7ae25-7f1d-7eaa-3084-f3c5f417167a@126.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:02:27 +0800
From: xiaolinkui <xiaolinkui@....com>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, justinstitt@...gle.com, kuniyu@...zon.com,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipset: add ip_set lock to ip_set_test
Hi,
On 10/3/23 03:06, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, Simon Horman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:03:09PM +0800, xiaolinkui wrote:
>>> From: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@...inos.cn>
>>>
>>> If the ip_set is not locked during ip_set_test, the following situations
>>> may occur:
>>>
>>> CPU0 CPU1
>>> ip_rcv->
>>> ip_rcv_finish->
>>> ip_local_deliver->
>>> nf_hook_slow->
>>> iptable_filter_hook->
>>> ipt_do_table->
>>> set_match_v4->
>>> ip_set_test-> list_set_destroy->
>>> hash_net4_kadt-> set->data = NULL
>> I'm having a bit of trouble analysing this.
>> In particular, I'm concerned that in such a scenario set
>> itself will be also freed, which seems likely to lead to problems.
>>
>> Can you provide a more complete call stack for CPU1 ?
> ip_set_test() runs intentionally without holding a spinlock, it uses RCU.
>
> But I don't understand the scenario at all:
>
> CPU0: CPU1:
> hash_net4_kadt list_set_destroy
>
> so it's a hash:net type which works on a list
> of set type of sets only
>
> The list type of set can freely be destroyed (when not referenced), the
> destroy operation has no effect whatsoever on its possible hash:net type
> of member set.
>
> Moreover, kernel side add/del/test can only be performed when the set in
> question is referenced. Referenced sets cannot be deleted.
>
> So what is the scenario really in this case?
The case I want to express should be like this:
CPU0 CPU1
ip_set_test
| (1) iptables -D -> set->ref --
| (2) ipset destroy -> set->data=NULL
|
hash_net4_kadt
|
hash_net4_test
For the convenience of description, the definition is as follows:
cmd(1): iptables -D
cmd(2): ipset destroy
When the ip_set test has already started in CPU0, but before it ends.
For example, when CPU0 runs between ip_set_test and hash_net4_kadt,
CPU1 executes cmd (1) and cmd (2).
In addition, if CPU 0 runs between hash_net4_kadt and hash_net4_test,
CPU1 executes cmd (1) and cmd (2). The following call trace will be
triggered:
crash> bt
PID: 0 TASK: ffff8003a1cd2680 CPU: 7 COMMAND: "swapper/7"
#0 [ffff8003fff3f460] crash_kexec at ffff0000081af828
#1 [ffff8003fff3f490] die at ffff00000808f754
#2 [ffff8003fff3f4d0] die_kernel_fault at ffff0000080aa9ac
#3 [ffff8003fff3f500] __do_kernel_fault at ffff0000080aa67c
#4 [ffff8003fff3f530] do_page_fault at ffff000008bfa66c
#5 [ffff8003fff3f620] do_translation_fault at ffff000008bfab64
#6 [ffff8003fff3f650] do_mem_abort at ffff000008081284
#7 [ffff8003fff3f830] el1_ia at ffff00000808310c
PC: ffff00000342225c [hash_net4_test+68]
LR: ffff000003420200 [hash_net4_kadt+208]
SP: ffff8003fff3f840 PSTATE: 60400005
X29: ffff8003fff3f840 X28: ffff8003a78ca600 X27: ffff8003fff3f908
X26: 0000000000000000 X25: ffff000000c70600 X24: ffff8003b8232400
X23: ffff000002f90fcc X22: 0000000000000000 X21: ffff8003fff3f9d0
X20: ffff8003fff3f910 X19: ffff8003fff3f9c8 X18: 0000000000000000
X17: 0000000000000000 X16: 0000000000000000 X15: 0000000000000000
X14: 970000002d494600 X13: 0000000000000000 X12: a40d15d8df825036
X11: ffff000000c70600 X10: ffff8003b2deb000 X9: 0000000000000001
X8: 0000000000000000 X7: 00000000637c7464 X6: ffff000003422218
X5: 00000000637c7464 X4: 0000000000000000 X3: ffff8003fff3f9d0
X2: ffff8003fff3f910 X1: ffff8003fff3f908 X0: 0000000000000020
#8 [ffff8003fff3f840] hash_net4_test at ffff000003422258
[ip_set_hash_net]
#9 [ffff8003fff3f8d0] hash_net4_kadt at ffff0000034201fc
[ip_set_hash_net]
#10 [ffff8003fff3f940] ip_set_test at ffff000002c011b8 [ip_set]
#11 [ffff8003fff3f990] set_match_v4 at ffff000002f90fc8 [xt_set]
#12 [ffff8003fff3fa20] ipt_do_table at ffff000000c504e0 [ip_tables]
#13 [ffff8003fff3fb60] iptable_filter_hook at ffff0000026e006c
[iptable_filter]
#14 [ffff8003fff3fb80] nf_hook_slow at ffff000008ac7a84
#15 [ffff8003fff3fbc0] ip_local_deliver at ffff000008ad5d88
#16 [ffff8003fff3fc10] ip_rcv_finish at ffff000008ad59b4
#17 [ffff8003fff3fc40] ip_rcv at ffff000008ad5dec
#18 [ffff8003fff3fca0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffff000008a6c344
#19 [ffff8003fff3fce0] __netif_receive_skb at ffff000008a6c3ac
#20 [ffff8003fff3fd00] netif_receive_skb_internal at ffff000008a6c440
#21 [ffff8003fff3fd30] napi_gro_receive at ffff000008a6d3ec
#22 [ffff8003fff3fd60] receive_buf at ffff000001c734d8 [virtio_net]
#23 [ffff8003fff3fe20] virtnet_poll at ffff000001c753e8 [virtio_net]
#24 [ffff8003fff3fec0] net_rx_action at ffff000008a6c9ec
#25 [ffff8003fff3ff60] __softirqentry_text_start at ffff0000080819f0
#26 [ffff8003fff3fff0] irq_exit at ffff0000080f1228
#27 [ffff8003fff40010] __handle_domain_irq at ffff000008162a10
Of course, the ip_set_test execution cycle is very short. During this
period,
another CPU needs to complete the cmd1 and cmd2 operations on the
ip_set, the
probability of triggering this problem will be very low.
This problem has also occurred in Red Hat:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6839381
But I think the solution mentioned in the link is not applicable.
Commit c120959387ef(netfilter: fix a use-after-free in mtype_destroy())
applies
to ip_set_bitmap instead of ip_set_hash.
Best regards,
Linkui
>
> Best regards,
> Jozsef
>
>>> h = set->data
>>> .cidr = INIT_CIDR(h->nets[0].cidr[0], HOST_MASK)
>>>
>>> The set->data is empty, continuing to access set->data will result in a
>>> kernel NULL pointer. The call trace is as follows:
>>>
>>> [2350616.024418] Call trace:
>>> [2350616.024670] hash_net4_kadt+0x38/0x148 [ip_set_hash_net]
>>> [2350616.025147] ip_set_test+0xbc/0x230 [ip_set]
>>> [2350616.025549] set_match_v4+0xac/0xd0 [xt_set]
>>> [2350616.025951] ipt_do_table+0x32c/0x678 [ip_tables]
>>> [2350616.026391] iptable_filter_hook+0x30/0x40 [iptable_filter]
>>> [2350616.026905] nf_hook_slow+0x50/0x100
>>> [2350616.027256] ip_local_deliver+0xd4/0xe8
>>> [2350616.027616] ip_rcv_finish+0x90/0xb0
>>> [2350616.027961] ip_rcv+0x50/0xb0
>>> [2350616.028261] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x58/0x68
>>> [2350616.028716] __netif_receive_skb+0x28/0x80
>>> [2350616.029098] netif_receive_skb_internal+0x3c/0xa8
>>> [2350616.029533] napi_gro_receive+0xf8/0x170
>>> [2350616.029898] receive_buf+0xec/0xa08 [virtio_net]
>>> [2350616.030323] virtnet_poll+0x144/0x310 [virtio_net]
>>> [2350616.030761] net_rx_action+0x158/0x3a0
>>> [2350616.031124] __do_softirq+0x11c/0x33c
>>> [2350616.031470] irq_exit+0x11c/0x128
>>> [2350616.031793] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc0
>>> [2350616.032172] gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0x170
>>> [2350616.032528] el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
>>> [2350616.032835] arch_cpu_idle+0x38/0x1c0
>>> [2350616.033183] default_idle_call+0x24/0x58
>>> [2350616.033549] do_idle+0x1a4/0x268
>>> [2350616.033859] cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x78
>>> [2350616.034234] secondary_start_kernel+0x17c/0x1c8
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@...inos.cn>
>>> ---
>>> net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
>>> index 35d2f9c9ada0..46f4f47e29e4 100644
>>> --- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
>>> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
>>> @@ -747,7 +747,9 @@ ip_set_test(ip_set_id_t index, const struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> !(opt->family == set->family || set->family == NFPROTO_UNSPEC))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + ip_set_lock(set);
>>> ret = set->variant->kadt(set, skb, par, IPSET_TEST, opt);
>>> + ip_set_unlock(set);
>>>
>>> if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
>>> /* Type requests element to be completed */
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>>
> -
> E-mail : kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, kadlecsik.jozsef@...ner.hu
> PGP key : https://wigner.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
> Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics
> H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists