[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231003162410.lnugwuooxd25o4ax@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 19:24:10 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@....com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 11/15] net: phylink: support the
25GBase-KR-S and 25GBase-CR-S link modes too
Hi Russell,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 04:49:00PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Treat the newly introduced subsets of 25GBase-KR and 25GBase-CR the same
> > way as the fully-featured link modes. The difference only consists in
> > RS-FEC support.
>
> As mentioned in the patch adding these new linkmodes, I wonder whether
> this should be part of that patch. Is there a reason to keep it
> separate?
I can squash this into the other CR-S/KR-S patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists