netdev - Re: [patch iproute2-next v2 3/5] devlink: introduce support for netns id for nested handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZRxMrelhKF9QHGrj@nanopsycho>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 19:17:33 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	daniel.machon@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2-next v2 3/5] devlink: introduce support for
 netns id for nested handle

Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 06:37:31PM CEST, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>On 9/29/23 5:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>> The attribute is a namespace id, and the value is a namespace id. Given
>>>> that, the name here should be netnsid (or nsid - we did a horrible job
>>>> with consistency across iproute2 commands). I have not followed the
>>>> kernel patches to understand what you mean by nested devlink instance.
>>>
>>> Please do that. Again, the netnsid is related to the nested instance.
>>> Therefore I put the "nested_devlink" in the name. Putting just "netnsid"
>>> as you suggest is wrong. Another possibility would be do nest this into
>>> object, but:
>>> 1) I didn't find nice way to do that
>>> 2) We would break linecards as they expose nested_devlink already
>
>well, that just shows I make mistakes as a reviewer. These really long
>command lines are really taxing.

So what do you suggest?