[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52dd8a1c-e0f0-4a24-b6d7-6ba1c9482525@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 23:32:41 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Paweł Dembicki <paweldembicki@...il.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/8] net: dsa: vsc73xx: convert to PHYLINK
> I plan to make rgmii delays configurable from the device tree. Should I?
> a. switch to phy_interface_is_rgmii in the current patch?
> b. add another patch in this series?
> c. wait with change to phy_interface_is_rgmii for patch with rgmii
> delays configuration?
Do you actually need this feature? Does the PHY you are using already
support fine tuning of the delays?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists