[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <651beb27.7b0a0220.fe7ca.2796@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:21:26 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: phy: aquantia: add firmware load
support
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:07:25PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > This is problematic... Since this is a plain standard PHY and we don't
> > have a compatible (as it's matched with the PHY id) we don't have DT to
> > add this... Sooo how to add this? Should we update the generic-phy dt?
> >
> > Should we create a dummy dt and add a compatible adding
> > ethernet-phy.ID... just for this properties?
> >
> > This is why we were a bit confused about adding a DT commit to this.
>
> Just do what other PHYs do. ti,dp83869.yaml, motorcomm,yt8xxx.yaml,
> nxp,tja11xx.yaml, etc.
>
Thanks I prepared a DT hoping it will be good in v2.
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists