netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:42:35 +0800
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
 wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, gbayer@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
 alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com,
 dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM
 extension and loopback-ism



On 2023/9/29 21:31, Alexandra Winter wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28.09.23 19:29, Wen Gu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/9/28 16:56, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27.09.23 17:16, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>>>> Hello Wen Gu,
>>>>
>>>> I applied and built your patches and noticed some things that you may want to consider in the next version:
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI, patchwork basically complains about many the same issues:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=787037&state=*
>>>
>>> In general you should run those check BEFORE you send the patches and not rely on patchwork.
>> Thank you Sandy. I seem to have not seen the specific content of these checks. May I ask how to
>> run those patchwork check locally? So that I can make sure everything is ok before send them.
>>
> 
> Citing from Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst :
> 
> "patchwork checks
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Checks in patchwork are mostly simple wrappers around existing kernel
> scripts, the sources are available at:
> 
> https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/tree/master/tests
> 
> **Do not** post your patches just to run them through the checks.
> You must ensure that your patches are ready by testing them locally
> before posting to the mailing list. The patchwork build bot instance
> gets overloaded very easily and netdev@...r really doesn't need more
> traffic if we can help it."
> 
> HTH

Thank you! Sandy.