[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231004092613.07cb393f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 09:26:13 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: xgmac: EST interrupts
handling
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:12:15 +0300 Serge Semin wrote:
> If I didn't miss some details after that we'll have a common EST
> module utilized for both DW QoS Eth and DW XGMAC IP-cores.
So the question now is whether we want Rohan to do this conversion
_first_, in DW QoS 5, and then add xgmac part. Or the patch should
go in as is and you'll follow up with the conversion?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists