lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231005070538.0826bf9d@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 07:05:38 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com> Cc: alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, fancer.lancer@...il.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: xgmac: EST interrupts handling On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 20:14:41 +0800 Rohan G Thomas wrote: > > So the question now is whether we want Rohan to do this conversion _first_, > > in DW QoS 5, and then add xgmac part. Or the patch should go in as is and > > you'll follow up with the conversion? > > If agreed, this commit can go in. I can submit another patch with the > refactoring suggested by Serge. Did you miss the emphasis I put on the word "first" in my reply? Cleanup first, nobody will be keeping track whether your fulfilled your promises or not :|
Powered by blists - more mailing lists