netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: xgmac: EST interrupts handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 07:05:38 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>
Cc: alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 fancer.lancer@...il.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: xgmac: EST interrupts
 handling

On Thu,  5 Oct 2023 20:14:41 +0800 Rohan G Thomas wrote:
> > So the question now is whether we want Rohan to do this conversion _first_,
> > in DW QoS 5, and then add xgmac part. Or the patch should go in as is and
> > you'll follow up with the conversion?  
> 
> If agreed, this commit can go in. I can submit another patch with the
> refactoring suggested by Serge.

Did you miss the emphasis I put on the word "first" in my reply?
Cleanup first, nobody will be keeping track whether your fulfilled 
your promises or not :|