[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202310050738.ZFOKzSlA-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 07:47:48 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, toke@...nel.org, willemb@...gle.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, magnus.karlsson@...el.com, bjorn@...nel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, hawk@...nel.org,
yoong.siang.song@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xdp-hints@...-project.net, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] net/mlx5e: Implement AF_XDP TX
timestamp and checksum offload
Hi Stanislav,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Stanislav-Fomichev/xsk-Support-tx_metadata_len/20231004-040718
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231003200522.1914523-5-sdf%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] net/mlx5e: Implement AF_XDP TX timestamp and checksum offload
config: s390-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231005/202310050738.ZFOKzSlA-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231005/202310050738.ZFOKzSlA-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310050738.ZFOKzSlA-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/tx.c: In function 'mlx5e_xsk_tx':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/tx.c:117:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'xsk_tx_metadata_to_compl'; did you mean 'xsk_tx_metadata_complete'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
117 | xsk_tx_metadata_to_compl(meta, &compl);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| xsk_tx_metadata_complete
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +117 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/tx.c
63
64 bool mlx5e_xsk_tx(struct mlx5e_xdpsq *sq, unsigned int budget)
65 {
66 struct xsk_buff_pool *pool = sq->xsk_pool;
67 struct xsk_tx_metadata *meta = NULL;
68 union mlx5e_xdp_info xdpi;
69 bool work_done = true;
70 bool flush = false;
71
72 xdpi.mode = MLX5E_XDP_XMIT_MODE_XSK;
73
74 for (; budget; budget--) {
75 int check_result = INDIRECT_CALL_2(sq->xmit_xdp_frame_check,
76 mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame_check_mpwqe,
77 mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame_check,
78 sq);
79 struct mlx5e_xmit_data xdptxd = {};
80 struct xdp_desc desc;
81 bool ret;
82
83 if (unlikely(check_result < 0)) {
84 work_done = false;
85 break;
86 }
87
88 if (!xsk_tx_peek_desc(pool, &desc)) {
89 /* TX will get stuck until something wakes it up by
90 * triggering NAPI. Currently it's expected that the
91 * application calls sendto() if there are consumed, but
92 * not completed frames.
93 */
94 break;
95 }
96
97 xdptxd.dma_addr = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(pool, desc.addr);
98 xdptxd.data = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(pool, desc.addr);
99 xdptxd.len = desc.len;
100 meta = xsk_buff_get_metadata(pool, desc.addr);
101
102 xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(pool, xdptxd.dma_addr, xdptxd.len);
103
104 ret = INDIRECT_CALL_2(sq->xmit_xdp_frame, mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame_mpwqe,
105 mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame, sq, &xdptxd,
106 check_result, meta);
107 if (unlikely(!ret)) {
108 if (sq->mpwqe.wqe)
109 mlx5e_xdp_mpwqe_complete(sq);
110
111 mlx5e_xsk_tx_post_err(sq, &xdpi);
112 } else {
113 mlx5e_xdpi_fifo_push(&sq->db.xdpi_fifo, xdpi);
114 if (xp_tx_metadata_enabled(sq->xsk_pool)) {
115 struct xsk_tx_metadata_compl compl;
116
> 117 xsk_tx_metadata_to_compl(meta, &compl);
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists