[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231005195812.549776-7-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 21:57:41 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/37] can: dev: can_restart(): don't crash kernel if carrier is OK
During testing, I triggered a can_restart() with the netif carrier
being OK [1]. The BUG_ON, which checks if the carrier is OK, results
in a fatal kernel crash. This is neither helpful for debugging nor for
a production system.
[1] The root cause is a race condition in can_restart() which will be
fixed in the next patch.
Do not crash the kernel, issue an error message instead, and continue
restarting the CAN device anyway.
Fixes: 39549eef3587 ("can: CAN Network device driver and Netlink interface")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231005-can-dev-fix-can-restart-v2-1-91b5c1fd922c@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c b/drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c
index 7f9334a8af50..a5bbdfa9a269 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c
@@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ static void can_restart(struct net_device *dev)
struct can_frame *cf;
int err;
- BUG_ON(netif_carrier_ok(dev));
+ if (netif_carrier_ok(dev))
+ netdev_err(dev, "Attempt to restart for bus-off recovery, but carrier is OK?\n");
/* No synchronization needed because the device is bus-off and
* no messages can come in or go out.
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists