[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZR/tginYKa7Zcwug@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 13:20:34 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] igb: Fix an end of loop test
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 04:57:21PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> When we exit a list_for_each_entry() without hitting a break statement,
> the list iterator isn't NULL, it just point to an offset off the
> list_head. In that situation, it wouldn't be too surprising for
> entry->free to be true and we end up corrupting memory.
>
> The way to test for these is to just set a flag.
>
> Fixes: c1fec890458a ("ethernet/intel: Use list_for_each_entry() helper")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists