netdev - Re: [RFC] docs: netdev: encourage reviewers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e3bff9c3-4b0f-c176-4053-9ef7e800b111@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 17:38:22 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 andrew@...n.ch, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, sd@...asysnail.net,
 horms@...ge.net.au
Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: netdev: encourage reviewers

On 06/10/2023 17:30, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Add a section to our maintainer doc encouraging reviewers
> to chime in on the mailing list.
> 
> The questions about "when is it okay to share feedback"
> keep coming up (most recently at netconf) and the answer
> is "pretty much always".
> 
> The contents are partially based on a doc we wrote earlier
> and shared with the vendors (for the "driver review rotation").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
[...]
> +Last but not least patch review may become a negative process, focused
> +on pointing out problems. Please throw in a complement once in a while,
> +particularly for newbies!

sp: compliment.

Otherwise looks good.
-ed