netdev - Re: macvtap performs IP defragmentation, causing MTU problems for virtual machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 08:06:31 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Henrik Lindström <lindstrom515@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: macvtap performs IP defragmentation, causing MTU problems for
 virtual machines

Henrik Lindström <lindstrom515@...il.com> wrote:
> On onsdag 4 oktober 2023 10:00:37 CEST Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Can you submit this formally, with proper changelog and Signed-off-by?
> > See scripts/checkpatch.pl in the kernel tree.
> Sure, i can give it a shot. How do i properly credit you if i submit your
> patch with some small changes of my own?

You can use:

"Suggested-by:" tag here.

> > You could also mention in changelog that this is ipv4 only because
> > ipv6 already considers the interface index during reassembly.
> Interesting. I've been trying to understand the code and it seems like
> ipv6 does defragmentation per-interface, while ipv4 does it "per-vrf"
> (correct me if i'm wrong). Is there any reason for this difference? 

Only for linklocal and multicasts.  Added in
264640fc2c5f4f913db5c73fa3eb1ead2c45e9d7 . Even mentions macvlan in the
changelog.

> The idea being that bcast/mcast packets are always defragmented
> per-interface, and unicast packets always "per-vrf".

LGTM, but please CC dsahern@...nel.org once you submit the patch.