netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] net/sched: Introduce tc block ports tracking and use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZSEw32MVPK/qCsyz@nanopsycho>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 12:20:15 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, mleitner@...hat.com, vladbu@...dia.com,
	simon.horman@...igine.com, pctammela@...atatu.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] net/sched: Introduce tc block ports
 tracking and use

Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 01:00:00AM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 6:25 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 15:06:45 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> > > I don't understand the need for configuration less here. You don't have
>> > > it for the rest of the actions. Why this is special?
>>
>> +1, FWIW
>
>We dont have any rule that says all actions MUST have parameters ;->
>There is nothing speacial about any action that doesnt have a
>parameter.

You are getting the configuration from the block/device the action is
attached to. Can you point me to another action doing that?