netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix secure_{tcp, tcpv6}_ts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231007105019.GA20662@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 12:50:19 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: George Guo <dongtai.guo@...ux.dev>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, George Guo <guodongtai@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix secure_{tcp, tcpv6}_ts_off call parameter order
 mistake

George Guo <dongtai.guo@...ux.dev> wrote:
> From: George Guo <guodongtai@...inos.cn>
> 
> Fix secure_tcp_ts_off and secure_tcpv6_ts_off call parameter order mistake

Could you please send a v2, targetting net-next, that clearly
says that this is a cleanup?

[ It doesn't matter if we pass "saddr, daddr" or
  "daddr, saddr" as long as both "init" and "check"
  functions agree on the ordering ]