[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-K4bCBpUVtDR_cv=bagRL+vM4Rusez+uHFTb4_kR8XkpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 04:54:56 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com,
yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, willemb@...gle.com, gustavoars@...nel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, steffen.klassert@...unet.com, nogikh@...gle.com,
pablo@...filter.org, decui@...rosoft.com, cai@....pw, jakub@...udflare.com,
elver@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] tun: Introduce virtio-net hashing feature
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:44 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023/10/09 17:13, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 12:22 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> virtio-net have two usage of hashes: one is RSS and another is hash
> >> reporting. Conventionally the hash calculation was done by the VMM.
> >> However, computing the hash after the queue was chosen defeats the
> >> purpose of RSS.
> >>
> >> Another approach is to use eBPF steering program. This approach has
> >> another downside: it cannot report the calculated hash due to the
> >> restrictive nature of eBPF.
> >>
> >> Introduce the code to compute hashes to the kernel in order to overcome
> >> thse challenges. An alternative solution is to extend the eBPF steering
> >> program so that it will be able to report to the userspace, but it makes
> >> little sense to allow to implement different hashing algorithms with
> >> eBPF since the hash value reported by virtio-net is strictly defined by
> >> the specification.
> >>
> >> The hash value already stored in sk_buff is not used and computed
> >> independently since it may have been computed in a way not conformant
> >> with the specification.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
> >
> >> @@ -2116,31 +2172,49 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (vnet_hdr_sz) {
> >> - struct virtio_net_hdr gso;
> >> + union {
> >> + struct virtio_net_hdr hdr;
> >> + struct virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash v1_hash_hdr;
> >> + } hdr;
> >> + int ret;
> >>
> >> if (iov_iter_count(iter) < vnet_hdr_sz)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> - if (virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(skb, &gso,
> >> - tun_is_little_endian(tun), true,
> >> - vlan_hlen)) {
> >> + if ((READ_ONCE(tun->vnet_hash.flags) & TUN_VNET_HASH_REPORT) &&
> >> + vnet_hdr_sz >= sizeof(hdr.v1_hash_hdr) &&
> >> + skb->tun_vnet_hash) {
> >
> > Isn't vnet_hdr_sz guaranteed to be >= hdr.v1_hash_hdr, by virtue of
> > the set hash ioctl failing otherwise?
> >
> > Such checks should be limited to control path where possible
>
> There is a potential race since tun->vnet_hash.flags and vnet_hdr_sz are
> not read at once.
It should not be possible to downgrade the hdr_sz once v1 is selected.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists