| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:40:48 +0200
From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>, Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>, Nils Hoppmann <niho@...ux.ibm.com>,
Niklas Schnell <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net/smc: Fix pos miscalculation in statistics
From: Nils Hoppmann <niho@...ux.ibm.com>
SMC_STAT_PAYLOAD_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, key, _len, _rc) will calculate
wrong bucket positions for payloads of exactly 4096 bytes and
(1 << (m + 12)) bytes, with m == SMC_BUF_MAX - 1.
Intended bucket distribution:
Assume l == size of payload, m == SMC_BUF_MAX - 1.
Bucket 0 : 0 < l <= 2^13
Bucket n, 1 <= n <= m-1 : 2^(n+12) < l <= 2^(n+13)
Bucket m : l > 2^(m+12)
Current solution:
_pos = fls64((l) >> 13)
[...]
_pos = (_pos < m) ? ((l == 1 << (_pos + 12)) ? _pos - 1 : _pos) : m
For l == 4096, _pos == -1, but should be _pos == 0.
For l == (1 << (m + 12)), _pos == m, but should be _pos == m - 1.
In order to avoid special treatment of these corner cases, the
calculation is adjusted. The new solution first subtracts the length by
one, and then calculates the correct bucket by shifting accordingly,
i.e. _pos = fls64((l - 1) >> 13), l > 0.
This not only fixes the issues named above, but also makes the whole
bucket assignment easier to follow.
Same is done for SMC_STAT_RMB_SIZE_SUB(_smc_stats, _tech, k, _len),
where the calculation of the bucket position is similar to the one
named above.
Fixes: e0e4b8fa5338 ("net/smc: Add SMC statistics support")
Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nils Hoppmann <niho@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_stats.h | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
index aa8928975cc6..9d32058db2b5 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_stats.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
@@ -92,13 +92,14 @@ do { \
typeof(_smc_stats) stats = (_smc_stats); \
typeof(_tech) t = (_tech); \
typeof(_len) l = (_len); \
- int _pos = fls64((l) >> 13); \
+ int _pos; \
typeof(_rc) r = (_rc); \
int m = SMC_BUF_MAX - 1; \
this_cpu_inc((*stats).smc[t].key ## _cnt); \
- if (r <= 0) \
+ if (r <= 0 || l <= 0) \
break; \
- _pos = (_pos < m) ? ((l == 1 << (_pos + 12)) ? _pos - 1 : _pos) : m; \
+ _pos = fls64((l - 1) >> 13); \
+ _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
this_cpu_inc((*stats).smc[t].key ## _pd.buf[_pos]); \
this_cpu_add((*stats).smc[t].key ## _bytes, r); \
} \
@@ -138,9 +139,12 @@ while (0)
do { \
typeof(_len) _l = (_len); \
typeof(_tech) t = (_tech); \
- int _pos = fls((_l) >> 13); \
+ int _pos; \
int m = SMC_BUF_MAX - 1; \
- _pos = (_pos < m) ? ((_l == 1 << (_pos + 12)) ? _pos - 1 : _pos) : m; \
+ if (_l <= 0) \
+ break; \
+ _pos = fls((_l - 1) >> 13); \
+ _pos = (_pos <= m) ? _pos : m; \
this_cpu_inc((*(_smc_stats)).smc[t].k ## _rmbsize.buf[_pos]); \
} \
while (0)
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists