netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 19:04:00 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com, tmgross@...ch.edu,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] rust: core abstractions for network PHY
 drivers

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 04:48:34PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:54 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> >
> > Can rustdoc be invoked in a similar way? Perform a check on a file,
> > issue errors, but don't actually generate any documentation? If it
> > can, it would be good to extend W=1 with this.
> 
> The Rust docs (like the Rust code) are supposed to be warning-free
> (and should remain like that, at the very least for `defconfig` and so
> on -- modulo mistakes, of course).

'supposed to' is often not enough.

The netdev CI results can be seen here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231009013912.4048593-2-fujita.tomonori@gmail.com/

It would of been nice if netdev/kdoc test had failed if rustdoc found
problems.

We could add a new test, if rustdoc can be run on individual files.

   Andrew