[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <73f552a4-4ff5-441a-a624-ddc34365742f@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:23:08 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
"Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"Johan Hedberg" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"Luiz Augusto von Dentz" <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Chun-Yi Lee" <jlee@...e.com>,
"Luiz Augusto von Dentz" <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Iulia Tanasescu" <iulia.tanasescu@....com>,
"Wenjia Zhang" <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: mark bacmp() and bacpy() as __always_inline
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 18:02, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:36:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I have to retract this, something went wrong on my
>> testing and I now see the same problem in some configs regardless
>> of whether the patch is applied or not.
>
> Perhaps turn them into macros instead?
I just tried that and still see the problem even with the macro,
so whatever gcc is doing must be a different issue. Maybe it
has correctly found a codepath that triggers this?
If you are able to help debug the issue better,
see these defconfigs for examples:
https://pastebin.com/raw/pC8Lnrn2
https://pastebin.com/raw/yb965unC
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists