[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 09:59:01 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net>, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, Michael
Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S .
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Doug Brown
<doug@...morgal.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] wireless: atmel: remove unused ioctl function
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> writes:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> This function has no callers, and for the past 20 years, the request_firmware
> interface has been in place instead of the custom firmware loader.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Yuck, good riddance. In the title we prefer "wifi:" over "wireless:" but
that's nitpicking. I assume this goes via a net tree so:
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Let me know if I should take this to wireless-next instead.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists