netdev - [PATCH net-XXX] SUNRPC: Add an IS_ERR() check back to where it was

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <356fb42c-9cf1-45cd-9233-ac845c507fb7@moroto.mountain>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:00:22 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@...il.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-XXX] SUNRPC: Add an IS_ERR() check back to where it was

This IS_ERR() check was deleted during in a cleanup because, at the time,
the rpcb_call_async() function could not return an error pointer.  That
changed in commit 25cf32ad5dba ("SUNRPC: Handle allocation failure in
rpc_new_task()") and now it can return an error pointer.  Put the check
back.

A related revert was done in commit 13bd90141804 ("Revert "SUNRPC:
Remove unreachable error condition"").

Fixes: 037e910b52b0 ("SUNRPC: Remove unreachable error condition in rpcb_getport_async()")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
It's possible Smatch was responsible for generating the original warning
because it warns for unnecessary NULL checks.  But generally, there was
a future error pointer implied.  Those warnings are just a hint, not a
command.

 net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
index 5988a5c5ff3f..102c3818bc54 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
@@ -769,6 +769,10 @@ void rpcb_getport_async(struct rpc_task *task)
 
 	child = rpcb_call_async(rpcb_clnt, map, proc);
 	rpc_release_client(rpcb_clnt);
+	if (IS_ERR(child)) {
+		/* rpcb_map_release() has freed the arguments */
+		return;
+	}
 
 	xprt->stat.bind_count++;
 	rpc_put_task(child);
-- 
2.39.2