[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSaC0Qg0UwHveMcz@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:11:13 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, corbet@....net,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] dpll: add phase-offset and phase-adjust
Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 12:12:31PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com wrote:
>Improve monitoring and control over dpll devices.
>Allow user to receive measurement of phase difference between signals
>on pin and dpll (phase-offset).
>Allow user to receive and control adjustable value of pin's signal
>phase (phase-adjust).
>
>v4->v5:
>- rebase series on top of net-next/main, fix conflict - remove redundant
> attribute type definition in subset definition
>
>v3->v4:
>- do not increase do version of uAPI header as it is not needed (v3 did
> not have this change)
>- fix spelling around commit messages, argument descriptions and docs
>- add missing extack errors on failure set callbacks for pin phase
> adjust and frequency
>- remove ice check if value is already set, now redundant as checked in
> the dpll subsystem
>
>v2->v3:
>- do not increase do version of uAPI header as it is not needed
>
>v1->v2:
>- improve handling for error case of requesting the phase adjust set
>- align handling for error case of frequency set request with the
>approach introduced for phase adjust
Again,
set-
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists