[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PH0PR18MB47342FEB8D57162EE5765E3CC7D3A@PH0PR18MB4734.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:00:05 +0000
From: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haseeb Gani <hgani@...vell.com>
CC: Vimlesh Kumar <vimleshk@...vell.com>,
"egallen@...hat.com"
<egallen@...hat.com>,
"mschmidt@...hat.com" <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>,
Sathesh B Edara
<sedara@...vell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Satananda Burla
<sburla@...vell.com>,
Abhijit Ayarekar <aayarekar@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [net PATCH] octeon_ep: update BQL sent bytes before
ringing doorbell
Hi,
If tx completion and start_xmit happen on 2 different CPUs, how do you
ensure that xmit_completion will observe the values written here?
Specifically, don't you need to move netdev_tx_sent_queue() before the
above memory barrier?
>>> Yes, you are correct. I'll update the changeset. Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists