[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231012050829-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:50:33 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost 00/22] virtio-net: support AF_XDP zero copy
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 04:32:40PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 15:50:13 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 9:58 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:00:57 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:27:06 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > > ## AF_XDP
> > > > >
> > > > > XDP socket(AF_XDP) is an excellent bypass kernel network framework. The zero
> > > > > copy feature of xsk (XDP socket) needs to be supported by the driver. The
> > > > > performance of zero copy is very good. mlx5 and intel ixgbe already support
> > > > > this feature, This patch set allows virtio-net to support xsk's zerocopy xmit
> > > > > feature.
> > > >
> > > > You're moving the driver and adding a major feature.
> > > > This really needs to go via net or bpf.
> > > > If you have dependencies in other trees please wait for
> > > > after the merge window.
> > >
> > >
> > > If so, I can remove the first two commits.
> > >
> > > Then, the sq uses the premapped mode by default.
> > > And we can use the api virtqueue_dma_map_single_attrs to replace the
> > > virtqueue_dma_map_page_attrs.
> > >
> > > And then I will fix that on the top.
> > >
> > > Hi Micheal and Jason, is that ok for you?
> >
> > I would go with what looks easy for you but I think Jakub wants the
> > series to go with next-next (this is what we did in the past for
> > networking specific features that is done in virtio-net). So we need
> > to tweak the prefix to use net-next instead of vhost.
>
> OK.
>
> I will fix that in next version.
>
> Thanks.
Scaling scope back as far as possible is a good idea generally.
I am not sure how this will work though. Let's see.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists