netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: Use conduit and user terms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231012192738.34ed1f19@hermes.local>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:27:38 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli
 <f.fainelli@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, "open list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
 support" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
 support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: Use conduit and user terms

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 02:10:29 +0300
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:

> >  Secondly, it is possible to perform load balancing between CPU ports on a per
> >  packet basis, rather than statically assigning user ports to CPU ports.
> > -This can be achieved by placing the DSA masters under a LAG interface (bonding
> > +This can be achieved by placing the DSA conduits under a LAG interface (bonding
> >  or team). DSA monitors this operation and creates a mirror of this software LAG
> > -on the CPU ports facing the physical DSA masters that constitute the LAG slave
> > +on the CPU ports facing the physical DSA conduits that constitute the LAG user  
> 
> Replacing "LAG slave devices" with "LAG user devices" wasn't warranted,
> and it alters the meaning.

The term slave is not in the IEEE 802 standard.
Most other implementations use member instead of slave.