netdev - Re: [PATCH] rfkill: fix deadlock in rfkill_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fec9cfe4436786f6f9b61ee6e9bb7766efb29d34.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 22:01:45 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Edward AD <twuufnxlz@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	syzbot+509238e523e032442b80@...kaller.appspotmail.com, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: fix deadlock in rfkill_send_events

On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 09:29 +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 10:43:22AM +0800, Edward AD wrote:
> > Hi Simon Horman,
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:06:38 +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > I am wondering if you considered moving the rfkill_sync() calls
> > > to before &data->mtx is taken, to avoid the need to drop and
> > > retake it?
> > If you move rfkill_sync() before calling &data->mtx, more code will be added 
> > because rfkill_sync() is in the loop body.
> 
> Maybe that is true. And maybe that is a good argument for
> not taking the approach that I suggested. But I do think it
> is simpler from a locking perspective, and that has some merit.
> 

FWIW, I missed this patch and discussion until now, but I already fixed
the issue differently:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless.git/commit/?id=f2ac54ebf85615a6d78f5eb213a8bbeeb17ebe5d

There was never any need to hold the data->mtx for anything but the list
manipulation, and even that isn't _really_ needed since the 'data' is
completely fresh and not seen anywhere else yet.

(I'll also note that the subject of this thread is wrong since this was
never an *actual* deadlock, just a *possible* one reported by lockdep.)

johannes