[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231014071423.UgDor1v0@linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:14:23 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Gilbert Adikankwu <gilbertadikankwu@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, manishc@...vell.com,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, coiby.xu@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: qlge: Add bool type to qlge_idc_wait()
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:58:13AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 07:11:59AM +0100, Gilbert Adikankwu wrote:
> > Reported by checkpatch:
> >
> > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> >
>
> What checkpatch is telling you here is that the "else" is redundant and
> can be removed. Although your patch suppresses the warning, it makes the
> code messier :(
Ah wait, after reading Julia's comment, I realize that the "else" is not
redundant at all. Seems like checkpatch.pl is lying. So ignore what I
said.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists