netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72kT=wWDO-tb9z3N962g3Zi2v=_jwhE9YC4ZwteAOyYfCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 14:00:10 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: benno.lossin@...ton.me, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, tmgross@...ch.edu, 
	boqun.feng@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers

On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:22 AM FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The same quesiton, 4th time?

Perhaps you should then be documenting this better in the code?

> Boqun asked me to drop mut on v3 review and then you ask why on v4?
> Trying to find a way to discourage developpers to write Rust
> abstractions? :)
>
> I would recommend the Rust reviewers to make sure that such would
> not happen. I really appreciate comments but inconsistent reviewing is
> painful.

Different people will give you different feedback. That feedback may
be inconsistent or may pull you in different directions, which is
typically a sign that things are not clear for at least somebody. Some
feedback may be simply wrong, too. It is what it is, even if we try
our best to be consistent.

It is especially interesting that you are the one saying this, because
you were the one that wanted to go quickly to the mailing list,
including the netdev one. That is perfectly fine, but the result is
that people may not be on the same page and it will take time to
converge, especially for something new. So I am not sure what you are
complaining about.

Now, something more serious is happening here, which is you implying
that reviewers are intentionally trying to discourage you. That is
simply not acceptable.

Cheers,
Miguel