[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2594bb24-74dc-4785-b46d-e1bffcc3e7ed@daynix.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 02:10:35 +0900
From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>,
Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_VNET_HASH
On 2023/10/16 1:07, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 7:17 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com> wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 0448700890f7..298634556fab 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -988,6 +988,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, /* a program that can execute syscalls */
>> BPF_PROG_TYPE_NETFILTER,
>> + BPF_PROG_TYPE_VNET_HASH,
>
> Sorry, we do not add new stable program types anymore.
>
>> @@ -6111,6 +6112,10 @@ struct __sk_buff {
>> __u8 tstamp_type;
>> __u32 :24; /* Padding, future use. */
>> __u64 hwtstamp;
>> +
>> + __u32 vnet_hash_value;
>> + __u16 vnet_hash_report;
>> + __u16 vnet_rss_queue;
>> };
>
> we also do not add anything to uapi __sk_buff.
>
>> +const struct bpf_verifier_ops vnet_hash_verifier_ops = {
>> + .get_func_proto = sk_filter_func_proto,
>> + .is_valid_access = sk_filter_is_valid_access,
>> + .convert_ctx_access = bpf_convert_ctx_access,
>> + .gen_ld_abs = bpf_gen_ld_abs,
>> +};
>
> and we don't do ctx rewrites like this either.
>
> Please see how hid-bpf and cgroup rstat are hooking up bpf
> in _unstable_ way.
Can you describe what "stable" and "unstable" mean here? I'm new to BPF
and I'm worried if it may mean the interface stability.
Let me describe the context. QEMU bundles an eBPF program that is used
for the "eBPF steering program" feature of tun. Now I'm proposing to
extend the feature to allow to return some values to the userspace and
vhost_net. As such, the extension needs to be done in a way that ensures
interface stability.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists