netdev - [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] sock: Code cleanup on __sk_mem_raise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231016132812.63703-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 21:28:10 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] sock: Code cleanup on __sk_mem_raise_allocated()

Code cleanup for both better simplicity and readability.
No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
---
 net/core/sock.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 290165954379..43842520db86 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3039,17 +3039,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_wait_data);
  */
 int __sk_mem_raise_allocated(struct sock *sk, int size, int amt, int kind)
 {
-	bool memcg_charge = mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg;
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled ? sk->sk_memcg : NULL;
 	struct proto *prot = sk->sk_prot;
-	bool charged = true;
+	bool charged = false;
 	long allocated;
 
 	sk_memory_allocated_add(sk, amt);
 	allocated = sk_memory_allocated(sk);
-	if (memcg_charge &&
-	    !(charged = mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(sk->sk_memcg, amt,
-						gfp_memcg_charge())))
-		goto suppress_allocation;
+
+	if (memcg) {
+		if (!mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(memcg, amt, gfp_memcg_charge()))
+			goto suppress_allocation;
+		charged = true;
+	}
 
 	/* Under limit. */
 	if (allocated <= sk_prot_mem_limits(sk, 0)) {
@@ -3104,8 +3106,8 @@ int __sk_mem_raise_allocated(struct sock *sk, int size, int amt, int kind)
 		 */
 		if (sk->sk_wmem_queued + size >= sk->sk_sndbuf) {
 			/* Force charge with __GFP_NOFAIL */
-			if (memcg_charge && !charged) {
-				mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(sk->sk_memcg, amt,
+			if (memcg && !charged) {
+				mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(memcg, amt,
 					gfp_memcg_charge() | __GFP_NOFAIL);
 			}
 			return 1;
@@ -3117,8 +3119,8 @@ int __sk_mem_raise_allocated(struct sock *sk, int size, int amt, int kind)
 
 	sk_memory_allocated_sub(sk, amt);
 
-	if (memcg_charge && charged)
-		mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(sk->sk_memcg, amt);
+	if (charged)
+		mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(memcg, amt);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.37.3