netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2840729.1697472569@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:09:29 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
    Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
    Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
    Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
    Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
    Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
    Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
    Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
    linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
    v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking

Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:

> It's nice to see this go into common code, but why not go ahead and
> convert ceph (and possibly NFS) to use this? Is there any reason not to?

I'm converting ceph on a follow-on branch and for ceph this will be dealt with
there.

I could do NFS round about here, I suppose.

David