lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+sq2CcA_Cv8sQ8_vqCAW=EoXTkCfoEE8QNWEQmnyHTNfK0wdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:56:42 +0530
From: Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
To: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Mubashir Adnan Qureshi <mubashirq@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chao Wu <wwchao@...gle.com>, 
	Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 0/5] Analyze and Reorganize core Networking
 Structs to optimize cacheline consumption

> On AMD platforms with 100Gb/s NIC and 256Mb L3 cache:
> IPv6
> Flows   with patches  clean kernel    Percent reduction
> 30k     0.000202535503  0.0003275329163 -38.16%
>
> On Intel platforms with 200Gb/s NIC and 105Mb L3 cache:
> IPv6
> Flows   with patches    clean kernel    Percent reduction
> 30k     0.0006296537873 0.0006370427753 -1.16%
>

Great work !!.

What are the L1/L2 cache size and cache line width on these AMD and
Intel platforms ?

Thanks,
Sunil.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ