netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/18] Introducing P4TC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:58:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, anjali.singhai@...el.com,
 namrata.limaye@...el.com, deb.chatterjee@...el.com,
 john.andy.fingerhut@...el.com, dan.daly@...el.com, Vipin.Jain@....com,
 tom@...anda.io, mleitner@...hat.com, Mahesh.Shirshyad@....com,
 tomasz.osinski@...el.com, jiri@...nulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 vladbu@...dia.com, horms@...nel.org, khalidm@...dia.com, toke@...hat.com,
 mattyk@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/18] Introducing P4TC

On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:56:15 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > Um. Maybe.. Sparse generates more false positives than good warnings
> > lately :( We'd have to add some extra info like "Note that sparse
> > is known to generate false-positive warnings, if you think that the
> > warning generated with C=1 is bogus, ignore it and note that fact
> > in the commit message".
> >  
> 
> > I don't like documenting things which aren't clear-cut :(  
> 
> Upto you - couldnt sum up from above if you want a patch or not. I
> think it makes sense to document C=1 somewhere since it helps your
> overhead.
> But the comment Similar in spirit to the checkpatch comment if - "But
> do not be mindlessly robotic in doing so..."

Weak preference for keeping it as is.
The wins on my end don't justify the extra rule for the drive-by
developers.