[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9666242b-d899-c428-55bd-14f724cc4ffd@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 22:53:15 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 00/11] bpf: tcp: Add SYN Cookie
generation/validation SOCK_OPS hooks.
On 10/13/23 3:04 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> Under SYN Flood, the TCP stack generates SYN Cookie to remain stateless
> After 3WHS, the proxy restores SYN and forwards it and ACK to the backend
> server. Our kernel module works at Netfilter input/output hooks and first
> feeds SYN to the TCP stack to initiate 3WHS. When the module is triggered
> for SYN+ACK, it looks up the corresponding request socket and overwrites
> tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn with the proxy's cookie. Then, the module can
> complete 3WHS with the original ACK as is.
Does the current kernel module also use the timestamp bits differently?
(something like patch 8 and patch 10 trying to do)
>
> This way, our SYN Proxy does not manage the ISN mappings and can stay
> stateless. It's working very well for high-bandwidth services like
> multiple Tbps, but we are looking for a way to drop the dirty hack and
> further optimise the sequences.
>
> If we could validate an arbitrary SYN Cookie on the backend server with
> BPF, the proxy would need not restore SYN nor pass it. After validating
> ACK, the proxy node just needs to forward it, and then the server can do
> the lightweight validation (e.g. check if ACK came from proxy nodes, etc)
> and create a connection from the ACK.
>
> This series adds two SOCK_OPS hooks to generate and validate arbitrary
> SYN Cookie. Each hook is invoked if BPF_SOCK_OPS_SYNCOOKIE_CB_FLAG is
> set to the listening socket in advance by bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set().
>
> The user interface looks like this:
>
> BPF_SOCK_OPS_GEN_SYNCOOKIE_CB
>
> input
> |- bpf_sock_ops.sk : 4-tuple
> |- bpf_sock_ops.skb : TCP header
> |- bpf_sock_ops.args[0] : MSS
> `- bpf_sock_ops.args[1] : BPF_SYNCOOKIE_XXX flags
>
> output
> |- bpf_sock_ops.replylong[0] : ISN (SYN Cookie) ------.
> `- bpf_sock_ops.replylong[1] : TS value -----------. |
> | |
> BPF_SOCK_OPS_CHECK_SYNCOOKIE_CB | |
> | |
> input | |
> |- bpf_sock_ops.sk : 4-tuple | |
> |- bpf_sock_ops.skb : TCP header | |
> |- bpf_sock_ops.args[0] : ISN (SYN Cookie) <-----'
> `- bpf_sock_ops.args[1] : TS value <----------'
>
> output
> |- bpf_sock_ops.replylong[0] : MSS
> `- bpf_sock_ops.replylong[1] : BPF_SYNCOOKIE_XXX flags
>
> To establish a connection from SYN Cookie, BPF_SOCK_OPS_CHECK_SYNCOOKIE_CB
> hook must set a valid MSS to bpf_sock_ops.replylong[0], meaning that
> BPF_SOCK_OPS_GEN_SYNCOOKIE_CB hook must encode MSS to ISN or TS val to be
> restored in the validation hook.
>
> If WScale, SACK, and ECN are detected to be available in SYN packet, the
> corresponding flags are passed to args[0] of BPF_SOCK_OPS_GEN_SYNCOOKIE_CB
> so that bpf prog need not parse the TCP header. The same flags can be set
> to replylong[0] of BPF_SOCK_OPS_CHECK_SYNCOOKIE_CB to enable each feature
> on the connection.
>
> For details, please see each patch. Here's an overview:
>
> patch 1 - 4 : Misc cleanup
> patch 5, 6 : Add SOCK_OPS hook (only ISN is available here)
> patch 7, 8 : Make TS val available as the second cookie storage
> patch 9, 10 : Make WScale, SACK, and ECN configurable from ACK
> patch 11 : selftest, need some help from BPF experts...
I cannot reprod the issue. Commented in patch 11.
I only scanned through the high level of the patchset. will take a closer look.
Thanks.
>
> [0]: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/netconf/2023/kuniyuki.pdf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists