| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:44:49 +0100
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...sta.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Bob Gilligan <gilligan@...sta.com>, Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>, Dmitry Safonov
<0x7f454c46@...il.com>, Donald Cassidy <dcassidy@...hat.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, "Eric W. Biederman"
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri05@...il.com>,
"Gaillardetz, Dominik" <dgaillar@...na.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Ivan Delalande <colona@...sta.com>, Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>,
"Nassiri, Mohammad" <mnassiri@...na.com>,
"Tetreault, Francois" <ftetreau@...na.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 net-next 08/23] net/tcp: Add AO sign to RST packets
Hi Oliver,
On 10/18/23 08:32, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Dmitry Safonov,
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:19:56AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>> On 10/17/23 09:37, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> kernel test robot noticed "BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_net/core/sock.c" on:
>>>
>>> commit: df13d11e6a2a3cc5f973aca36f68f880fa42d55f ("[PATCH v14 net-next 08/23] net/tcp: Add AO sign to RST packets")
[..]
>>>
>>> [ 221.348247][ T7133] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:2978
>>> [ 221.349875][ T7133] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 7133, name: trinity-c4
>>> [ 221.351666][ T7133] preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
>>> [ 221.352614][ T7133] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
>>> [ 221.353518][ T7133] 2 locks held by trinity-c4/7133:
>>> [ 221.354530][ T7133] #0: ed8b5660 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg (net/ipv4/tcp.c:1336)
>>> [ 221.374314][ T7133] #1: c27dbb18 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: inet6_csk_xmit (include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c:129)
>>> [ 221.375906][ T7133] CPU: 1 PID: 7133 Comm: trinity-c4 Tainted: G W TN 6.6.0-rc4-01105-gdf13d11e6a2a #1
>>
>> Quite puzzling. It doesn't seem that it can happen to inet6_csk_xmit():
>>
>> : rcu_read_lock();
>> : skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst);
>> :
>> : /* Restore final destination back after routing done */
>> : fl6.daddr = sk->sk_v6_daddr;
>> :
>> : res = ip6_xmit(sk, skb, &fl6, sk->sk_mark, rcu_dereference(np->opt),
>> : np->tclass, sk->sk_priority);
>> : rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>> So, I presumed the calltrace was for nested rcu_read_lock() case.
>> Then I've looked at all return/goto cases, I couldn't find any
>> unbalanced rcu_read_{,un}lock().
>>
>> Is this reproducible by any chance?
>
> do you mean how often it could be reproduced?
>
> we run the tests upon this commit and parent both up to 15 times.
> from below, parent shows quite clean, but there are various issues while
> running tests upon this patch.
Thanks a lot for running your tests over it!
That's what a fresh brain does:
I see that tcp_v6_send_reset() with neither CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG nor
CONFIG_TCP_AO set does grab rcu_read_lock() [as I wasn't sure at that
moment that nothing but md5 key does rely on that being held], but the
exit is covered with ifdefs:
: #if defined(CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG) || defined(CONFIG_TCP_AO)
: out:
: if (allocated_traffic_key)
: kfree(key.traffic_key);
: rcu_read_unlock();
: #endif
Seems to have been correct versions ago (version 6), but on refactoring
when I've moved ifdeffs to tcp_parse_auth_options() declaration to
pollute less code - missed this.
Thanks again for your testing and reporting!
> 8468a6f4f3143 net/tcp: Add tcp_parse_auth_options()
> df13d11e6a2a3 net/tcp: Add AO sign to RST packets
>
> 8468a6f4f3143ba2 df13d11e6a2a3cc5f973aca36f6
> ---------------- ---------------------------
> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> | | |
> :15 87% 13:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_arch/x86/entry/common.c
> :15 33% 5:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_fs/dcache.c
> :15 13% 2:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
> :15 60% 9:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_include/linux/sched/mm.h
> :15 7% 1:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/locking/mutex.c
> :15 7% 1:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> :15 7% 1:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/sched/completion.c
> :15 40% 6:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/task_work.c
> :15 33% 5:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_lib/iov_iter.c
> :15 33% 5:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_lib/strncpy_from_user.c
> :15 20% 3:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_lib/usercopy.c
> :15 13% 2:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/vmscan.c
> :15 100% 15:15 dmesg.BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_net/core/sock.c
> :15 100% 15:15 dmesg.EIP:rcu_note_context_switch
> :15 100% 15:15 dmesg.WARNING:at_kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:#rcu_note_context_switch
> :15 100% 15:15 dmesg.WARNING:lock_held_when_returning_to_user_space
> :15 100% 15:15 dmesg.is_leaving_the_kernel_with_locks_still_held
>
[..]
Thanks,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists