[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27912b49-eb1a-4100-a260-03299e8efdd4@engleder-embedded.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:56:45 +0200
From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To: Lai Peter Jun Ann <jun.ann.lai@...el.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] taprio: Add boundary check for
sched-entry values
On 18.10.23 05:28, Lai Peter Jun Ann wrote:
> Adds boundary checks for the gatemask provided against the number of
> traffic class defined for each sched-entry.
>
> Without this check, the user would not know that the gatemask provided is
> invalid and the driver has already truncated the gatemask provided to
> match the number of traffic class defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Peter Jun Ann <jun.ann.lai@...el.com>
> ---
> net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> index 1cb5e41..44b9e21 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct taprio_sched {
> u32 max_sdu[TC_MAX_QUEUE]; /* save info from the user */
> u32 fp[TC_QOPT_MAX_QUEUE]; /* only for dump and offloading */
> u32 txtime_delay;
> + u8 num_tc;
> };
>
> struct __tc_taprio_qopt_offload {
> @@ -1063,6 +1064,11 @@ static int fill_sched_entry(struct taprio_sched *q, struct nlattr **tb,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (entry->gate_mask >= q->num_tc) {
As far as I know within gate_mask every bit represents a traffic class.
So for 3 traffic classes at gate_mask of 0x7 is valid but this check
fails with 0x7 >= 3.
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Traffic Class defined less than gatemask");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> entry->interval = interval;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1913,6 +1919,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
> for (i = 0; i <= TC_BITMASK; i++)
> netdev_set_prio_tc_map(dev, i,
> mqprio->prio_tc_map[i]);
> +
> + q->num_tc = mqprio->num_tc;
> }
>
> err = parse_taprio_schedule(q, tb, new_admin, extack);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists