[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1697616022.630633-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:00:22 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost 02/22] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_dma_[un]map_page_attrs
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 03:59:03 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:53:00PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Do you think it's appropriate to push the first two patches of this patch set to
> > linux 6.6?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I generally treat patchsets as a whole unless someone asks me to do
> otherwise. Why do you want this?
As we discussed, the patch set supporting AF_XDP will be push to net-next.
But the two patchs belong to the vhost.
So, if you think that is appropriate, I will post a new patchset(include the two
patchs without virtio-net + AF_XDP) to vhost. I wish that can be merged to 6.6.
Then when the 6.7 net-next merge window is open, I can push this patch set to 6.7.
The v1 version use the virtqueue_dma_map_single_attrs to replace
virtqueue_dma_map_page_attrs. But I think we should use virtqueue_dma_map_page_attrs.
Thanks.
>
> --
> MST
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists