lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5421248-3341-a5f7-84e6-c601df470a63@omp.ru>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:36:08 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ravb: Fix races between ravb_tx_timeout_work() and
 net related ops

Hello!

On 10/19/23 2:33 PM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:

> Fix races between ravb_tx_timeout_work() and functions of net_device_ops
> and ethtool_ops by using rtnl_trylock() and rtnl_unlock(). Note that
> since ravb_close() is under the rtnl lock and calls cancel_work_sync(),
> ravb_tx_timeout_work() should calls rtnl_trylock(). Otherwise, a deadlock
> may happen in ravb_tx_timeout_work() like below:
> 
> CPU0			CPU1
> 			ravb_tx_timeout()
> 			schedule_work()
> ...
> __dev_close_many()
> // Under rtnl lock
> ravb_close()
> cancel_work_sync()
> // Waiting
> 			ravb_tx_timeout_work()
> 			rtnl_lock()
> 			// This is possible to cause a deadlock
> 
> Fixes: c156633f1353 ("Renesas Ethernet AVB driver proper")
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>

[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 0ef0b88b7145..300c1885e1e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -1874,6 +1874,9 @@ static void ravb_tx_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
>  	int error;
>  
> +	if (!rtnl_trylock())
> +		return;

   I wonder if we should reschedule the work here...

[...]

MBR, Sergey

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ