[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169770170247.433869.3027675693618433446@kwain>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:48:22 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mhocko@...e.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock from device attributes
Quoting Stephen Hemminger (2023-10-18 20:13:43)
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:47:43 +0200
> Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > +static inline struct kernfs_node *sysfs_rtnl_lock(struct kobject *kobj,
> > + struct attribute *attr,
> > + struct net_device *ndev)
> Still reviewing the details here.
Thanks!
> But inline on static functions is not the code policy in networking
> related code. The argument is compiler will inline anyway if useful.
Right, I'll fix that.
Antoine
Powered by blists - more mailing lists