[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871qdpikq9.fsf@metaspace.dk>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:37:14 +0200
From: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@...aspace.dk>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, boqun.feng@...il.com,
wedsonaf@...il.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, greg@...ah.com, Miguel Ojeda
<ojeda@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] WIP rust: add second `bindgen` pass for
enum exhaustiveness checking
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com> writes:
> From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
>
> error[E0005]: refutable pattern in function argument
> --> rust/bindings/bindings_enum_check.rs:29:6
> |
> 29 | (phy_state::PHY_DOWN
> | ______^
> 30 | | | phy_state::PHY_READY
> 31 | | | phy_state::PHY_HALTED
> 32 | | | phy_state::PHY_ERROR
> ... |
> 35 | | | phy_state::PHY_NOLINK
> 36 | | | phy_state::PHY_CABLETEST): phy_state,
> | |______________________________^ pattern `phy_state::PHY_NEW` not covered
> |
> note: `phy_state` defined here
> --> rust/bindings/bindings_generated_enum_check.rs:60739:10
> |
> 60739 | pub enum phy_state {
> | ^^^^^^^^^
> ...
> 60745 | PHY_NEW = 5,
> | ------- not covered
> = note: the matched value is of type `phy_state`
>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
This patch does not build for me. Do I need to do something to make it
work?
BR Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists