netdev - Re: [PATCH iwl-next 3/6] i40e: Use DECLARE_BITMAP for flags and hw_features fields in i40e

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dadb40dc-3e09-470d-9eb4-8c725249aabd@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:28:29 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <mschmidt@...hat.com>, <dacampbe@...hat.com>, <poros@...hat.com>, "Jesse
 Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen
	<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
 Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, "moderated
 list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, open list
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 3/6] i40e: Use DECLARE_BITMAP for flags and
 hw_features fields in i40e_pf



On 10/20/2023 12:37 PM, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Convert flags and hw_features fields from i40e_pf from u32 to
> bitmaps and their usage to use bit access functions.
> 
> Changes:
> - Convert "pf_ptr->(flags|hw_features) & FL" to "test_bit(FL, ...)"
> - Convert "pf_ptr->(flags|hw_features) |= FL" to "set_bit(FL, ...)"
> - Convert "pf_ptr->(flags|hw_features) &= ~FL" to "clear_bit(FL, ...)"
> - Rename flag field to bitno in i40e_priv_flags and adjust ethtool
>   callbacks to work with flags bitmap
> - Rename flag names where '_ENABLED'->'_ENA' and '_DISABLED'->'_DIS'
>   like in ice driver

I've not been a big fan of the overly-shortened names in ice, but I
agree consistency is probably better.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>