[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231023130609.595122-1-dxld@darkboxed.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:06:09 +0200
From: Daniel Gröber <dxld@...kboxed.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Gröber <dxld@...kboxed.org>
Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: Fix leaking sockets in wg_socket_init error paths
This doesn't seem to be reachable normally, but while working on a patch
for the address binding code I ended up triggering this leak and had to
reboot to get rid of the leaking wg sockets.
---
drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c
index 0414d7a6ce74..c35163f503e7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ int wg_socket_init(struct wg_device *wg, u16 port)
ret = udp_sock_create(net, &port4, &new4);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("%s: Could not create IPv4 socket\n", wg->dev->name);
- goto out;
+ goto err;
}
set_sock_opts(new4);
setup_udp_tunnel_sock(net, new4, &cfg);
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ int wg_socket_init(struct wg_device *wg, u16 port)
goto retry;
pr_err("%s: Could not create IPv6 socket\n",
wg->dev->name);
- goto out;
+ goto err;
}
set_sock_opts(new6);
setup_udp_tunnel_sock(net, new6, &cfg);
@@ -414,6 +414,11 @@ int wg_socket_init(struct wg_device *wg, u16 port)
out:
put_net(net);
return ret;
+
+err:
+ sock_free(new4 ? new4->sk : NULL);
+ sock_free(new6 ? new6->sk : NULL);
+ goto out;
}
void wg_socket_reinit(struct wg_device *wg, struct sock *new4,
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists