netdev - [PATCH v1 net-next 02/12] tcp: Rearrange tests in inet_bind2_bucket_(addr_match|match_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231023190255.39190-3-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:02:45 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
CC: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/12] tcp: Rearrange tests in inet_bind2_bucket_(addr_match|match_addr_any)().

The protocol family tests in inet_bind2_bucket_addr_match() and
inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any() are ordered as follows.

  if (sk->sk_family != tb2->family)
  else if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
  else

This patch rearranges them so that AF_INET6 socket is handled first
to make the following patch tidy, where tb2->family will be removed.

  if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
  else if (tb2->family == AF_INET6)
  else

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index ac95b714e3f8..63032522c5d7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -149,18 +149,17 @@ static bool inet_bind2_bucket_addr_match(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb2,
 					 const struct sock *sk)
 {
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
-	if (sk->sk_family != tb2->family) {
-		if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET)
-			return ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&tb2->v6_rcv_saddr) &&
-				tb2->v6_rcv_saddr.s6_addr32[3] == sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
+	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
+		if (tb2->family == AF_INET6)
+			return ipv6_addr_equal(&tb2->v6_rcv_saddr, &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr);
 
 		return ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr) &&
 			sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr.s6_addr32[3] == tb2->rcv_saddr;
 	}
 
-	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
-		return ipv6_addr_equal(&tb2->v6_rcv_saddr,
-				       &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr);
+	if (tb2->family == AF_INET6)
+		return ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&tb2->v6_rcv_saddr) &&
+			tb2->v6_rcv_saddr.s6_addr32[3] == sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
 #endif
 	return tb2->rcv_saddr == sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
 }
@@ -836,17 +835,17 @@ bool inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb, const
 		return false;
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
-	if (sk->sk_family != tb->family) {
-		if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET)
-			return ipv6_addr_any(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr) ||
-				ipv6_addr_v4mapped_any(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr);
+	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
+		if (tb->family == AF_INET6)
+			return ipv6_addr_any(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr);
 
 		return ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr) &&
 			tb->rcv_saddr == 0;
 	}
 
-	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
-		return ipv6_addr_any(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr);
+	if (tb->family == AF_INET6)
+		return ipv6_addr_any(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr) ||
+			ipv6_addr_v4mapped_any(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr);
 #endif
 	return tb->rcv_saddr == 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.2