[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231023080611.19244-1-hbh25y@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:06:11 +0800
From: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
To: borisp@...dia.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: tls: Fix possible NULL-pointer dereference in tls_decrypt_device() and tls_decrypt_sw()
tls_rx_one_record can be called in tls_sw_splice_read and tls_sw_read_sock
with msg being NULL. This may lead to null pointer dereferences in
tls_decrypt_device and tls_decrypt_sw.
Fix this by adding a check.
Fixes: dd47ed3620e6 ("tls: rx: factor SW handling out of tls_rx_one_record()")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index e9d1e83a859d..411bf148f707 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1612,7 +1612,11 @@ tls_decrypt_sw(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *tls_ctx,
struct strp_msg *rxm;
int pad, err;
- err = tls_decrypt_sg(sk, &msg->msg_iter, NULL, darg);
+ if (msg == NULL)
+ err = tls_decrypt_sg(sk, NULL, NULL, darg);
+ else
+ err = tls_decrypt_sg(sk, &msg->msg_iter, NULL, darg);
+
if (err < 0) {
if (err == -EBADMSG)
TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSDECRYPTERROR);
@@ -1686,7 +1690,8 @@ tls_decrypt_device(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
off = rxm->offset + prot->prepend_size;
len = rxm->full_len - prot->overhead_size;
- err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(darg->skb, off, msg, len);
+ if (msg != NULL)
+ err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(darg->skb, off, msg, len);
if (err)
return err;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists