| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:39:39 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 16/19] virtio_net: xsk: rx: introduce receive_xsk() to recv xsk buffer
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:57:06 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:01 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > Implementing the logic of xsk rx. If this packet is not for XSK
> > determined in XDP, then we need to copy once to generate a SKB.
> > If it is for XSK, it is a zerocopy receive packet process.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio/main.c | 14 ++--
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h | 4 ++
> > drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/net/virtio/xsk.h | 4 ++
> > 4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > index 0e740447b142..003dd67ab707 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c
> > @@ -822,10 +822,10 @@ static void put_xdp_frags(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > - struct net_device *dev,
> > - unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > - struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> > +int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > + struct net_device *dev,
> > + unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> > {
> > struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> > int err;
> > @@ -1589,13 +1589,17 @@ static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct virtnet_rq *rq,
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + if (rcu_dereference(rq->xsk.pool))
> > + skb = virtnet_receive_xsk(dev, vi, rq, buf, len, xdp_xmit, stats);
> > + else if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > skb = receive_mergeable(dev, vi, rq, buf, ctx, len, xdp_xmit,
> > stats);
> > else if (vi->big_packets)
> > skb = receive_big(dev, vi, rq, buf, len, stats);
> > else
> > skb = receive_small(dev, vi, rq, buf, ctx, len, xdp_xmit, stats);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > if (unlikely(!skb))
> > return;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > index 6e71622fca45..fd7f34703c9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h
> > @@ -346,6 +346,10 @@ static inline bool virtnet_is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > + struct net_device *dev,
> > + unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats);
> > void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct virtnet_rq *rq);
> > void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct virtnet_rq *rq);
> > void virtnet_tx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct virtnet_sq *sq);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > index 841fb078882a..f1c64414fac9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,18 @@ static void sg_fill_dma(struct scatterlist *sg, dma_addr_t addr, u32 len)
> > sg->length = len;
> > }
> >
> > +static unsigned int virtnet_receive_buf_num(struct virtnet_info *vi, char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
> > +
> > + if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) {
> > + hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *)buf;
> > + return virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void virtnet_xsk_check_queue(struct virtnet_sq *sq)
> > {
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> > @@ -37,6 +49,114 @@ static void virtnet_xsk_check_queue(struct virtnet_sq *sq)
> > netif_stop_subqueue(dev, qnum);
> > }
> >
> > +static void merge_drop_follow_xdp(struct net_device *dev,
> > + struct virtnet_rq *rq,
> > + u32 num_buf,
> > + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_buff *xdp;
> > + u32 len;
> > +
> > + while (num_buf-- > 1) {
> > + xdp = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len);
> > + if (unlikely(!xdp)) {
> > + pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers missing\n",
> > + dev->name, num_buf);
> > + dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + stats->bytes += len;
> > + xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct sk_buff *construct_skb(struct virtnet_rq *rq,
> > + struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int metasize = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + unsigned int size;
> > +
> > + size = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_hard_start;
> > + skb = napi_alloc_skb(&rq->napi, size);
> > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data_meta - xdp->data_hard_start);
> > +
> > + size = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_meta;
> > + memcpy(__skb_put(skb, size), xdp->data_meta, size);
> > +
> > + if (metasize) {
> > + __skb_pull(skb, metasize);
> > + skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return skb;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct sk_buff *virtnet_receive_xsk(struct net_device *dev, struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > + struct virtnet_rq *rq, void *buf,
> > + unsigned int len, unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> > +{
>
> I wonder if anything blocks us from reusing the existing XDP logic?
> Are there some subtle differences?
1. We need to copy data to create skb for XDP_PASS.
2. We need to call xsk_buff_free() to release the buffer.
3. The handle for xdp_buff is difference.
virtnet_xdp_handler() is re-used. So the receive code is simple.
If we pushed this function into existing code, we would have to maintain
code scattered inside merge and small (and big). So I think it is a good
choice for us to put the xsk code into a function.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists