netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v12 0/5] introduce page_pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231023192434.40f5ee98@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:24:34 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
 Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 0/5] introduce page_pool_alloc() related
 API

On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:59:47 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> In [1] & [2] & [3], there are usecases for veth and virtio_net
> to use frag support in page pool to reduce memory usage, and it
> may request different frag size depending on the head/tail
> room space for xdp_frame/shinfo and mtu/packet size. When the
> requested frag size is large enough that a single page can not
> be split into more than one frag, using frag support only have
> performance penalty because of the extra frag count handling
> for frag support.
> 
> So this patchset provides a page pool API for the driver to
> allocate memory with least memory utilization and performance
> penalty when it doesn't know the size of memory it need
> beforehand.

I don't mean to cut off the discussion, if any is still to happen.
But AFAIU we have a general agreement that this is a good direction,
we're at v12 already, and it's getting late in the release cycle.
To give this series a chance of making v6.7 I will apply it now.
If there are any unresolved concerns in a couple of days we can drop it.