[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231025160818.GJ57304@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:08:18 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Catherine Sullivan <catherine.sullivan@...el.com>,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] i40e: Fix wrong check for I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 03:53:42PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> The I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR is i40e_ring flag and not i40e_pf one.
>
> Fixes: 8e0764b4d6be42 ("i40e/i40evf: Add support for writeback on ITR feature for X722")
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Thanks,
I agree that I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR is consistently used
as a i40e_ring flag, other than the case that is corrected by this patch.
I also agree that the problem was introduced by the cited commit.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists