[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuX+kJ8G2CitnACVgx_OSsdbtedD+dvXJ_REFdwzx56Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:35:43 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
"Liu, Yujie" <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] virtio-net: support tx netdim
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:44 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Similar to rx netdim, this patch supports adaptive tx
> coalescing moderation for the virtio-net.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 6ad2890a7909..1c680cb09d48 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,15 @@ struct send_queue {
>
> struct virtnet_sq_stats stats;
>
> + /* The number of tx notifications */
> + u16 calls;
> +
> + /* Is dynamic interrupt moderation enabled? */
> + bool dim_enabled;
> +
> + /* Dynamic Interrupt Moderation */
> + struct dim dim;
> +
> struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal;
>
> struct napi_struct napi;
> @@ -317,8 +326,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> u8 duplex;
> u32 speed;
>
> - /* Is rx dynamic interrupt moderation enabled? */
> + /* Is dynamic interrupt moderation enabled? */
> bool rx_dim_enabled;
> + bool tx_dim_enabled;
>
> /* Interrupt coalescing settings */
> struct virtnet_interrupt_coalesce intr_coal_tx;
> @@ -464,19 +474,40 @@ static bool virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static void virtnet_tx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work);
> +
> +static void virtnet_tx_dim_update(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_sq_stats *stats = &sq->stats;
> + struct dim_sample cur_sample = {};
> +
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> + dim_update_sample(sq->calls, stats->packets,
> + stats->bytes, &cur_sample);
> + u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
> +
> + net_dim(&sq->dim, cur_sample);
> +}
> +
> static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> - struct napi_struct *napi = &vi->sq[vq2txq(vq)].napi;
> + struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[vq2txq(vq)];
> + struct napi_struct *napi = &sq->napi;
> +
> + sq->calls++;
I wonder what's the impact of this counters for netdim. As we have a
mode of orphan skb in xmit.
We need to test to see.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists